As I was enjoying some fresh, hot General Tso's Chicken and crab meat rangoon with a a friend over lunch today, I mentioned that yesterday was a big day in the history of America. She looked at me puzzled and with a mouthful of sweet & sour chicken said, "Really?!?" Absolutely, the ban on same-sex marriages in California was overturned by the California Supreme Court yesterday! She responded in an interesting yet expected manner, "That's the end of the world" she said in a joking yet semi-serious tone. We both laughed and moved on, but that comment provoked in me so much thought and almost made me repulsed to think that I was in agreement with her...or was I?

Certainly neither of us thought it was the end of the world, and I knew what she meant by her comment...I think. Here in lies the problem with such a comment. According the the stereotypical evangelical view of homosexuality, we would see this as the end of the world. What could be worse than a bunch of homosexuals walking around holding hands and getting married in churches? (That's a joke). To many people, it couldn't get much worse.

On CNN they played a short clip of a white male, in a suit and tie describing how disgusting this ruling was for America. He said that we now have kids growing up to aspire to be gay. "That's just terrible," was how the clip ended. What's wrong with this ruling? Why can't homosexuals get married? It's a basic human right....right? Why would we try and amend the Constitution to give less rights to one people group? This same Constitution gave us (americans), the freedoms that we enjoy today!

For those of you who are reading this and know me, you might think I've gone off my rocker. If for some reason you are reading this and you don't know me or my background (unlikely), you might be in full agreement with me. Whatever the case - those are the questions that I leave this section of my post with. I would enjoy any response. :) I also had a friend who created a post on her blog last year, but I think it relates to this in a way - it's called Adam and Steve.

Moving on...kinda. I'm reading a book about the Great Commission and how for Westerners, our understanding and purpose within it is a little different than it once was. Westerners used to lead the way is sending missionaries to Asia and other parts of the world to "get them saved" and help them become better people. This book essentially states that no longer is that the case. It is now Westerners' job to support the native missionaries of the lands of Asia through money and prayer. We are after all very affluent. $60/month could support a missionary in India for 1 month. To support a Western missionary in India for 1 month could cost up to $3,000. What's a better investment?

Once we reach everyone across the world with the Gospel, it really is the end of the world.